OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine: The Best of Both Worlds

The Race is On!

Moving data can be expensive. Especially if it becomes a part of routine business operations. Moving rows between OLTP and OLAP is no different. You generate expenses especially when you generate a lot of transactions per day. The race to unify the OLTP and OLAP engines is on. Maybe you’re wondering if there is one best solution to adapt. OLTP-OLAP to the rescue. An overview of the technologies that attempt to overcome data silo limitations will help you understand the scope of the problem. Is there one engine to rule them all?

In this post, we will take a look at the main differences between OLTP and OLAP. We’ll also explore the goal of new tools available. In doing so, we’ll also chronicle the journey of a savvy business intelligence team looking for their perfect solution. Let’s start exploring how to address enterprise-level transactional and analytical needs. 

Technologies that attempt to merge functions of OLTP and OLAP are also sometimes called HTAP (Hybrid transaction/analytical processing).

Just a few months ago, Snowflake announced Unistore, a new workload for transactional and analytical data. Unistore is exciting news in the data world because adds another tool to the arsenal built for dismantling data silos. Traditionally, we store transactional and analytical data separately. Unistore enables agile data access at scale. 

Using SingleStore is another approach to the problems silos create when we treat transactional and analytical data differently. SingleStore is a distributed SQL database for data-intensive applications. SingleStore already supports OLTP and OLAP analytics on the same database. This allows it to perform transactions and also provide analytics in real time. If you add DBT to the stack, you can then transform OLTP data into an OLAP system. This, in turn, allows you to run reports on the same database where all your transactions are running.

One of the reservations we’ve seen expressed by data professionals is “I don’t need to learn this new technology. I can accomplish the same thing with MySQL.” And that is true to a certain extent. However, when the traffic reaches a certain level, being able to handle transactions and run aggregate queries simultaneously, on the same host becomes an operational issue. Some commonly performed operations can become costly. Think of all the “select count, sum, min, max and group by” statements. Those are not cheap. The cost grows in a way you may not expect because the MySQL engine is not meant to do reporting. It needs to work overtime, racking up computational expenses.

You could work around this challenge by creating a replica where it’s possible to run some queries more efficiently. This tactic works well until you start seeing steady, heavy and uninterrupted traffic and you start needing more of the expensive aggregate queries mentioned above.

The next logical step in addressing these challenges is to consider adding multiple replicas and a load balancer.At this point, your infrastructure cost starts to add up.

That’s all bad news, but if your primary MySQL server fails at any point, that presents another problem. This is a problem you can mitigate by having a stand-by on hand, but that’s yet another expense. Even if you’ve taken all of these measures, you can expect that primary server’s failure to result in a 5 to 10 minute downtime. 

If you’ve chosen to use AWS Aurora, these challenges are less common. Aurora’s parallel processing is AWS’s attempt to catch up with the functionality Snowflake provides. Its caching mechanism is better than what you’re working with in MySQL but the performance, on even the fastest queries, is still not comparable to SingleStore. Besides this, you cannot scale compute the same way as Snowflake does, with a simple select statement. 

Snowflake went the extra mile to support PK (primary key) and Foreign Keys (FK). The canny observer may wonder, based on this feature, if e-commerce Vendors like Shopify will start moving their OLTP on Snowflake or SingleStore in order to provide near real time analytics without having to move data between servers.

SingleStore’s column store engine has supported both OLTP and OLAP since 2019 and  Snowflake just released its Hybrid table. SingleStore supports memory engine, too, for super fast ingestion and can cache data as well. The question remains: Is Snowflake late to the party?

SingleStore might have another advantage to consider in this comparison: It supports MySQL protocol. Because of this, moving an existing app from MySQL to SingleStore is pretty straightforward. It will be a more difficult task to move your app’s data to Snowflake.

OLAP Vs. OLTP: What Are the Key Differences?

People often confuse these two terms for one another. What are their key differences and how can a  company evaluate options to help choose the best approach for your situation?

OLTP(Operational Logs Transactional Processing) is a database engine that builds upon business intelligence. OLTP engines can provide answers for specific, rigidly defined questions.

On the other hand, OLAP (Online Analytical Processing) is a flexibility-optimized database engine. Its best application is to answer higher-level questions in milliseconds.

OLTP-OLAP system design

Simply put, the purpose of OLTP is to manage transactions and OLAP supports decision-making. Transactions are typically generated by a system that interacts with customers or employees. For example, a customer may purchase an item from an online store. The OLTP system would record the purchase, update the inventory, and update the customer’s account.

An OLAP system can help you understand customer behavior. For example, the OLAP system might show how many items a customer has purchased in the past, what items they have purchased, and how much they have spent. This information can help the company understand what products to offer the customer and how to market them.

If you need to do reporting, another tool like Pentaho might be something worth considering. Pentaho can use MySQL as an integration data source.

The main difference between OLAP and OLTP as technologies is the way they process data. OLAP is designed for analysis of data, while OLTP is designed for transaction processing.

OLAP typically uses a multi-dimensional data model, which allows for quick analysis of data by slicing and dicing it in different ways. OLTP typically uses a tabular data model, which is better suited for centralized online transaction processing.

OLTP vs. OLAP characteristics

Enhanced performance and high availability are the key benefits of using a dedicated OLTP-OLAP unique engine. By separating OLTP and OLAP operations, you can improve performance, ensuring that the data required for OLAP processing is always available. You can also use a clustered file system or a load balancer to improve performance and high availability.

OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine is a new type of database that combines the best of both worlds: the performance and scalability of an OLTP database with the flexibility and querying power of an OLAP database. Unique Engine is designed for businesses that need to run fast, multi-dimensional queries on large amounts of data. It offers the performance and scalability of an OLTP database, while also providing the flexibility and querying power of an OLAP database.

Snowflake is currently the only cloud data warehousing solution that supports both OLTP (online transaction processing) and OLAP (online analytical processing) workloads in a single system. This unique architecture delivers the best of both worlds: the performance, scalability, and flexibility of a cloud data warehouse for your OLTP workloads, and the ease of use and fast performance of a traditional data warehouse for your OLAP workloads.

It is a common goal for database vendors to unify the OLTP and OLAP engines into a single platform. After all, this would seem to offer the best of both worlds – the performance and scalability of OLTP together with the flexibility and power of OLAP.

However, there are good reasons to question whether this is the right goal. Firstly, the OLTP and OLAP engines are actually quite different in their nature and purpose. OLTP focuses on transactional processing, while OLAP is focused on data analysis. They are two very different workloads, and trying to merge them into a single platform may not always be the best solution.

Secondly, unifying the engines can actually lead to a loss of performance and scalability. When you combine the OLTP and OLAP engines, the platform becomes more complex and the overhead of managing the system increases. This can lead to a decline in performance and scalability. However, it may end up being a better solution than other workarounds we’ve already explored.

So is it really worth trying to unify the OLTP and OLAP engines? In many cases, the answer is no. There are good reasons some organizations might choose to maintain two separate engines, each suited to a particular purpose.

OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine is an innovative approach to database design that combines the best of both OLTP and OLAP systems in one system that is both operational and analytical in nature.

OLTP systems provide fast, reliable transaction processing, while OLAP systems get you fast, efficient analysis of data. Traditionally, these two types of systems have been separate and distinct, with different architectures and data models.

The OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine has the following features:

– Fast, reliable transaction processing

– Fast, efficient analysis of data

– Flexible data model that supports both OLTP and OLAP operations

– Efficient use of disk space

– Scalability to accommodate large amounts of data

Data Replication and Partitioning

SAP HANA is another unique solution that offers an engine to handle both Online Transaction Processing and Online Analytical Processing workloads. SAP HANA can also handle data replication and partitioning. The unique engine is a key part of the OLTP-OLAP system. It is responsible for managing the data in the system, and it manages the interaction between the OLTP and OLAP systems.

The unique engine can also be described as a distributed system that runs on a cluster of servers. It is designed to be scalable, so it can handle large amounts of data. The unique engine is also fault-tolerant, so it can handle failures of individual servers. In terms of implementation, it is designed as a set of Java servlets.

Historical analysis of cloud observability data is one use-case focused on analyzing cloud observability data, initially gathered as operational data, to improve the understanding of past performance and to help identify issues before they become problems.

The first step is to gather data from all of the relevant sources. This includes data from the cloud provider, data from monitoring systems, and data from other sources such as log files. The data is then pre-processed to clean it up and to make it ready for analysis.

The next step is to analyze the data to identify trends and patterns. This can include analysis of time series data, correlation analysis, and other types of analysis.

The final step is to use the results of the analysis to improve the understanding of past performance and to help identify issues before they become problems. This can include creating reports, dashboards, and other types of visualizations.

Companies can use this data orchestration to analyze the performance of their cloud services in order to improve customer experience. The company could track how well their services respond to changes in load and usage and potentially identify any issues before they cause customer complaints. Additionally, the company could use the data to investigate the causes of outages and other performance issues in order to fix them and prevent them from happening again in the future.

We Can Help You Start Optimizing Your Data Usage

Clearly, there are a lot of options to sort through. OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine is a revolutionary new technology that enables you to get the most out of your data. With OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine, you can easily and quickly create a unified view of your data that combines the best of both worlds – the speed of OLTP and the flexibility of OLAP. From a business perspective, it means you can make just in time decisions using all of the data available to you. From a technical standpoint, this translates to a more stable system with less need to devote engineering time to keeping the system up to date and working. It also means that computations are more efficient. 

OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine is the perfect solution for organizations that need to quickly and easily analyze high volumes of data. This unique combination enables you to quickly and easily analyze your data, and get the insights you need to make informed decisions. It is also the perfect solution for organizations that need to scale their data analysis capabilities. With OLTP-OLAP Unique Engine, you can easily add new users and new data to your system, with very little complexity added.
Start implementing an efficient and powerful tool today. You can reap the rewards of OLAP and OLTP efficiently, and see the benefits for yourself! Data-Sleek’s team of data professionals can help you implement the right tool for your needs, saving you from considerable detours in the process of discovery and saving you time and money in your quest for on-target analysis.

What are the Advantages of Building a Data Warehouse In the Cloud?
Previous Post
What are the Advantages of Building a Data Warehouse In the Cloud?
How to Collaborate with Freelance Data Scientists and Data Engineers
Next Post
How to Collaborate with Freelance Data Scientists and Data Engineers